When Sister Celluloid and Movies Silently announced their “Try It, You’ll Like It” blogathon, I had to decide which noir picture could draw in the most diverse audience possible, even those who don’t like the style/genre. I quickly decided on 1946’s Gilda.
It’s a lush, gorgeous film–well directed and well acted–from Rita Hayworth in all her Hollywood-fashioned splendor to a brilliantined Glenn Ford and a wickedly dapper George Macready. It features mayhem and murder, love gone bad, slinky musical numbers, and even a kind of happy ending. And it questions in proto-feminist fashion how we decide a woman is a femme fatale and whether the men in noir who love such women are as straight as Hollywood pretends they are. If Gilda isn’t textbook noir, it’s certainly a commentary on textbook noir, and for me that’s a tempting way to get the apathetic or anti-noir crowd to watch.
This said, my desire to pitch Gilda for this blogathon was always complicated by knowledge of Hayworth’s difficult life–from abuse by her father as a pre-teen to abuse by husbands and Hollywood studio execs. She hated Hollywood even as she needed it, was shy and reclusive if given the opportunity, fought insecurity and an inability to truly live as an independent adult, and then she got early onset Alzheimer’s. When I recently listened to the Rita Hayworth/Orson Welles episode of the You Must Remember This podcast, my strange love of the film as a commentary on film noir as well as Hayworth’s life became even more complex. In this context, I can’t help but ask myself, should we enjoy Gilda? Hayworth didn’t want to make it, that much is certain. There’s so much suffering both in film content and production context. Yet, perhaps that makes it even more important, more poignant.
In the end, I must leave it to viewers to see for themselves. I’m certain that the “Try It, You’ll Like It” label still applies. But after you try it and like it, read up on Hayworth’s life and appreciate the film anew as a commentary on gender, race, and women’s lives in classic Hollywood.
December 6, 2015 at 6:30 PM
Good summation of the movie’s appeal. I must say that I’ve tried this movie and didn’t quite like it — not because it’s terrible (very well done on all counts), but because of the constant element of pain that you emphasize. The main characters in this movie are quite self-loathing and want to punish each other badly, and it’s pretty painful to watch. I’m sure that’s part of the movie’s point, but nevertheless, there it is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 6, 2015 at 6:44 PM
Very true. Amazing that many people just read it superficially and aren’t caught up in the pain.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 6, 2015 at 11:08 PM
Such a fascinating film. I’ve always thought one of the reasons for its continued appeal is that Hayworth brought such complexity to what could have been a stereotypical role. You feel her pain, her pride, her joy, her desire–Rita Hayworth might have spent much of her life claiming she wasn’t Gilda, but clearly used her own pain to connect with the character, and it shows.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 6, 2015 at 11:09 PM
Good point and well put. I must force myself to watch Lady from Shanghai next. More pain.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 6, 2015 at 11:29 PM
Love that one too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 7, 2015 at 7:15 PM
A great film, but not one I can watch that often. The performances are fab but, like others have said, I find it hard to watch Rita Hayworth because her character does have so much pain.
Loved your thoughtful, well-written review. If your post doesn’t single-handed convert people to the film noir category, I don’t know what will! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 7, 2015 at 7:16 PM
Understood. And many thanks for the praise.
LikeLike
December 8, 2015 at 9:57 PM
Thanks so much for joining in! Yes, this is a complicated and painful film on so many levels but it really is famous for a reason. Enjoyed your level-headed commentary.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 9, 2015 at 12:32 AM
Thanks for including me and for your feedback.
LikeLike