Prolific gay Hollywood director George Cukor was labeled a “woman’s director” early in his career. The term was partly a homophobic slur, but it also points to his success with actresses, particularly strong-willed or “difficult” stars, from Joan Crawford to Marilyn Monroe.
Cukor is also known for his collaborative directing style. He never wrote or altered scripts, for example. Instead, he assembled the best production team he could find, and worked congenially with all, encouraging input and respecting the talent he had gathered. He concentrated most fully on his actors, feeling their work is what most gave a film its sense of credibility and emotional power.
Cukor’s relationship with Hepburn was particularly fruitful. They worked together on ten films and were lifelong friends. Hepburn’s strength and wit paired perfectly with Cukor’s actor-intensive directing, and both shared a preference for privacy in their personal lives.
- A Bill of Divorcement (1932) – her first film
- Little Women (1933)
- Sylvia Scarlett (1935)
- Holiday (1938)
- The Philadelphia Story (1940)
- Keeper of the Flame (1942)
- Adam’s Rib (1949)
- Pat and Mike (1952)
- Love Among the Ruins (1975)
- The Corn is Green (1979)
Because this is a noir blog, I’ll use the picture closest to noir in style and subject that the two worked together on for my discussion, Keeper of the Flame.
Plot with Spoilers: Spencer Tracy is a determined journalist and Katharine Hepburn is the wife of a national hero who died under mysterious circumstances when his car drove off a bridge in this thriller/romance. Increasing intimacy between the intrepid reporter and the seemingly devoted widow brings out the truth: the dead man was not the next Abraham Lincoln, as his wife had envisioned him, but a budding fascist dictator. When she learned of his true nature, his wife let him go unwarned to his death. The lesson the film teaches at this crucial historical moment is vital (the US having recently joined forces with the Allies in WWII) is vital, as are several telling scenes and supporting characters, including a disdainfully presented patriotic Scout organization, a fanatically devoted male secretary, and the demented mother of the deceased.
Politically inflected noir melodrama is perhaps the best (if bulky) label for this second and arguably least compelling film pairing of Tracy and Hepburn. The cinematography emphasizes the darkness of the mystery. The love-hate relationship Hepburn shows as the widow of a “great man” helps us identify her with the trapped “good wife” of noir. And Tracy is a stand-in for the noir gumshoe.
Beyond the casting of Hepburn and direction by Cukor, Keeper of the Flame is also a collaborative effort in other ways. First, Hepburn persuaded Louis B. Mayer (MGM) to make the film and then to cast Tracy as the male lead. (She had just begun an affair with the married, alcoholic Tracy and wanted to keep her eye on him while bringing them together on the set.) She was particularly drawn to the fact that Cukor was chosen to direct. This would be his first and only overtly political film.
We can see in particular the way Cukor worked collaboratively with Hepburn in that Keeper of the Flame originally had no love plot. Hepburn had Cukor’s respect and his ear, and he agreed to the romance subplot as a way of strengthening the widow’s motivation to finally reveal the truth about her husband.
Though it has its merits, reviews were not strong for the film, and even Cukor had to admit the weaknesses of the film, from the wooden if believable performance by Tracy to the occasional phoniness of Hepburn’s emotional displays. And the limits of filming all scenes (both indoor and outdoor) on sound stages cannot be denied.
Perhaps the best that can be said for this intriguing but lesser effort is that it led to Cukor’s greater success with the Gothic-noir film Gaslight (1944), and, several years later, to Adam’s Rib, a return to the longstanding Cukor-Hepburn collaboration as well as a triumphant second take on the Cukor-Hepburn-Tracy trio.
This post is a contribution to CineMaven’s Symbiotic Collaborations Blogathon.
January 21, 2016 at 1:57 PM
One of my favorite actor/director partnerships ever.
LikeLiked by 2 people
January 23, 2016 at 4:53 PM
“Keeper of the Flame” is thoroughly professional, but it lacks that something special that holds the viewer and makes it memorable. The best people in the world can be working on a project and still it is no guarantee that their vision will work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 23, 2016 at 4:55 PM
I agree entirely.
LikeLike
January 23, 2016 at 7:05 PM
What a list of films! This one might not have been Cukor’s & Hepburn’s best, but the two obviously belonged in film together.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 23, 2016 at 9:43 PM
I knew Cukor and Hepburn worked on a lot of films together, but it wasn’t until I saw your list of them that I realized what a dynamic team they were. Those films alone make an impressive filmography!
I’ve not seen “Keeper of the Flame”, but I think it would be worth viewing, warts and all.
Thanks for this terrific post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 23, 2016 at 9:49 PM
Thanks for he praise, and hope you find Keeper of the Flame interesting, if not outstanding.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 24, 2016 at 5:31 PM
Gosh, I didn’t realize I was such a big Cukor fan, quite an impressive body of work!
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 24, 2016 at 6:11 PM
That happens to me, too: you suddenly see a full list and realize how many favorite films had the same director!
LikeLike
January 24, 2016 at 5:39 PM
Don’t think I’ve seen Keeper of the Flame, or at least I don’t remember seeing. One of the things I love about classic film. There was so much great talent that even their lesser efforts are worth watching.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 24, 2016 at 6:10 PM
Well put!
LikeLike
January 25, 2016 at 9:31 PM
Maybe it’s the cocooned feeling you get in a movie where even the exteriors are soundstage-shot, but it’s more than that. There’s a lack of energy around the proceedings, which is funny since the Tracy-Hepburn thing was in its first bloom. Good pacing and great performances can to some degree compensate for less-than-stellar material, but Keeper of the Flame just didn’t come together.
Thanks for your review and for not doing Tracy-Hepburn—she had other crucial relationships in film, and Cukor is probably the most important of the lot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 25, 2016 at 11:33 PM
Cukor and Hepburn were the perfect star / director pairing, and whilst this might not be my favourite collaborative film (thank goodness they got a second chance!) it’s still a great example of their working relationship. I particularly like the idea that KH persuaded him to include the romance subplot – I didn’t know that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 29, 2016 at 7:46 PM
I remember finding this one something of a disappointment when watching all the Hepburn/Tracy films, for all the reasons you describe here. You don’t hear so much about Hepburn/Cukor, but, looking at that list, it’s plain that it was just as important. Cukor is one of my favourite directors and it’s great to see you giving him some recognition here – I know that “women’s director” tag was meant to belittle, as you say, but he did direct so many actresses in great roles.
LikeLiked by 1 person